What Is an Existential War?
An existential war is derived from the "clash of civilizations." Its distinction from the clash of civilizations lies in its reciprocal nature—essentially a "them or us" scenario. In contrast, the clash of civilizations is often viewed as one-sided, favoring the "modern" civilization—a concept rooted in Ibn Khaldun’s theory of *asabiyyah* (social cohesion/group solidarity). Consequently, a conflict between Islam and the Jews would inevitably favor Islam, as it represents a newer, more cohesive force. While setbacks may occur along the way, they are merely "zigzag" movements—temporary reverses that are quickly rectified. For instance, during the early days of Islam, the Prophet engaged in approximately 81 existential conflicts; the Jews genuinely sought the total destruction of the Muslims, yet God’s promise ensured the victory of the Muslim community. Even when defeats occurred in a few instances, they served as vital lessons, preventing the Muslims from becoming arrogant or losing sight of their purpose. In the present day, although figures like Trump speak of destroying Iran, or Netanyahu discusses the collapse of the Islamic Republic, they know these claims are hollow—mere electioneering rhetoric. This is because Islam has already taken root within the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Israel, and beyond. Furthermore, should there be any faltering in Iran, the very citizens of the U.S., France, and Israel would themselves bring about the downfall of Zionism and imperialism—the sound of their breaking bones can already be heard.
Ahmad Mahini, Candidate for the Presidency of the United States
Think Tank for the Study of Power (Eqtedar-shenasi), Bibi Shahrbanu International University