Making promises is against the authority of the jurist. All the presidents became against the authority of the jurisprudence and revolted in their last days. The reason for all of them was to make promises. Making a promise or making a plan is the factor of turning a religious element into an anti-religious element. In the functional analysis of Ahampinejad, Rouhani, Khatami, Rafsanjani, and even Bani Sadr and others, we reach the same factor. The reason for this is the westernization of the candidates. Because in the West, the president can dissolve the parliament and issuing orders for war or peace is with the head of the army, but in the Iranian constitution, this is not the case, the commander-in-chief is the leader, and the plans and programs must be approved by the parliament. Neither is the second person. But promising the presidency means assuming the first person and absolute sovereignty. In other words, he says that in order to fulfill my promise, I have to make the Majlis and the legal guardian subordinate to me, which is contrary to the principle of separation of powers. In simple words, when the president gives orders or plans, he thinks that he has made the legal guardian and the Majlis subordinate to him. But in practice, he sees that the parliament opposes his bills, for example, due to budgetary reasons. Or the jurist does not give him the authority of the armed forces. Therefore, first he says that they won't let me work, and then he incites the people against these forces and projects failures, so to speak, he wants to pass the authority of the jurist. throws Because in the constitution, the president is the executive, not the legislator. That is, talking and making promises is against the constitution and against the authority of his becoming a jurist from the very beginning. He should only be a good executive and act as he swears and not think of dissolving the parliament. Because the law of Iran has not given such a permission, of course, in the draft, it was higher than Wali Faqih, which was later amended. For example, Mr. Khamenei, when he was the president, opposed Imam Khomeini's words about the absolute authority of the jurist. But after choosing themselves, they entered first in all the work. And with Hashemi's resistance, the issue remained silent.