social media

Social media and social media!

Some people think mass media is for governments. And social media for people. While this is not the case and all the media, such as the army and artillery, are at the disposal of the president or the central government, because they need a lot of funding. which the private sector is unable to provide. Even if he gets an advertisement, he should get an advertisement from government agencies. On the other hand, it is harmful for governments. Just as it is forbidden for people to be armed in most countries, it is also forbidden to have media. Even if the appearance of the case belongs to the people, still it must accept the regulations and regulation of the government. Or take orders from another government. For example, if the hypocrites want to have social networks, they should get the office from the government of Tirana, the budget from Al Saud and the forces from the subversive unit, because there is a possibility of information being leaked, or users being naive. The fact that they advertise, social media such as Instagram, Telegram, etc. is a free flow of information so that the budgets are not specified. Once the budget is determined, the mission of the organization will be revealed and everyone will know that the freedom of information trick was just to deceive the public. For example, the International, which receives its funding from Al Saud, or the BBC, which receives its funding from MIC Six, or the Voice of America, which receives funding from the CIA, does not directly attack or defend its master. Let the theory of deception come true. Ahmad Mahini, the US presidential candidate, says that according to a survey of users, 68,000 users use Instagram, 51% use Telegram, 38% use WhatsApp, and only 12% use Rubik's. And generating income from the Internet. While, all of these sell user information. Now they may sell to the government or foreign governments. Because it doesn't matter to them. In other words, they are the agents of collecting user information for governments. And therefore they are supported in terms of infrastructure and platforms. In order to organize social networks, there is no need to pressure users or set regulations and implement filtering. It is enough to clarify their budgetary origin. For example, since Saudi Arabia cut off its funding to the BBC, the Arabic BBC was also closed. Or when Israel failed to meet the Man-Veto budget, this network was also dissolved. You can even witness their change of direction following the change of financial sponsors. For example, Facebook, which merged, or Amazon, which became rich, changed their practices in world social movements. Therefore, it can be said very simply: all the important world media that receive funds from Al Saud, through Israel or the United States, cannot be guided. It is not possible for us to separate people from them by increasing media literacy.