Systemic

Productivity in a systemic approach

Productivity has a linear formula, and it is the ratio of data to output. But in a systemic view, this is false. Because it should be measured with internal and external factors. For example, in a workshop, raw materials are poured to make screws, and the worker makes them with full efficiency, but it does not match the base of the screw, it does not help. Or if it is not heated enough, and is fragile and has a short life (internal factors), it still does not hurt. Therefore, customer satisfaction should be added to productivity factors. Sometimes these factors are so many that it turns into a practical thesis. For example, in the practical treatise, it is said that the rules that a person needs should be learned, or it is said that the rules should be imitated, that is, the wheel should not be reinvented. Therefore, a systemic approach is not enough here. Because systems and subsystems are unlimited. Ahmad Mahini, the US presidential candidate, says that the systemic approach is a vicious circle, which means that it is unlimited both from above and from below. And man does not have control over the infinite. For example, instead of a simple linear formula for productivity, a matrix of variables should be formed. And because the determinant of the matrix is ​​limited, it does not include all factors. But in the divine view, everything is limited to God. Therefore, God's words are enough for productivity. When he says pray, he has seen millions of factors in it, one of which is avoiding laziness, exercising, being gentle, reminding...